As bad as the Catholic pedophile scandals have been, it’s important to remember that they appear to be just one part of a far bigger problem.
Taking one step back, we find similar abuse scandals among Jehovah’s Witnesses, Mormons, the Salvation Army, and other religious groups.
Taking another step back to widen our perspective even further, we find the Bible itself a less than child-friendly document. Although it does quote Jesus as saying “And whosoever shall offend one of these little ones that believe in me, it is better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he were cast into the sea” (Mark 9:42), most American Christians seem rather more fond of its “Spare the rod and spoil the child” mentality (as expressed in passages such as Proverbs 13:24 and Proverbs 23:13-14). Although many if not most modern psychologists seem to believe it is virtually never ok to spank a child (and numerous European countries have actually banned the practice), news stories about Christians who have severely beaten children pop up far more often then they should. (More about this can be found in an entry I posted on 7/14/02.) It’s also true that while the Ten Commandments tell us to honor our parents, they rather pointedly do not tell parents to honor their children. Similarly, Exodus 21:15 and 21:17 demand the death penalty for children who hit or curse their parents but parents who hit or curse their kids apparently don’t merit so much as a gentle rebuke or a dirty look.
Taking one more step back, we find other, less severe, but perhaps much more widespread behaviors inspired by Christianity that seem less than child-friendly. Forcing kids to dress up in uncomfortable clothes, sit quietly on hard pews, and listen to scary old men tell them for the umpteenth time what sinners they are and how awful hell is may not be quite as prevalent as it used to be, but has there ever been a Sunday yet in American history when it hasn’t been an acutely painful reality for thousands of young minds? Has there been a day yet in the last thousand years when untold thousands of people weren’t suffering from the lingering effects of the traumatizing variety of Christianity James Joyce detailed in his A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man? And how many more thousands, perhaps millions of young minds are now on the verge of being permanently traumatized by the gruesome images of Gibson’s “The Passion of the Christ”?
Taking yet one more step back, we can only wonder how much pain and damage may be inflicted on trusting young minds by parents in future years as they continue to pass along as Absolute Truth the Bible’s mythic accounts of inherited guilt, hell, crucifixion, demonic possession, murder, rape, holy war, holy slavery, holy plagues, genocide, a sudden worldwide flood, and impending apocalypse.
Stepping back again, we see that this isn’t merely the behavior of a few isolated, misguided parents but the long-standing standard operating procedure of much of organized religion. As the Jesuits so famously - and chillingly - once put it, “Give us a child until the age of five and we shall have him forever.” Far from apologizing for or being ashamed of exposing kids to the psychologically damaging myths and absurd worldview of the Bible, Christians have historically insisted on their right to do so - and they’ve proudly exercised that right in a highly organized fashion for centuries. Instead of recognizing how wrong and damaging it can be to play upon the fears of children, to abuse their trust, and to engage in blatant, disrespectful forms of brainwashing, Christians (like many other theists) have instead largely seized upon these unfortunate and unfair ways of instilling a message that fact and logic alone apparently cannot convince a mind to accept.
(To be continued...)

|
Absolutely brilliant. I really agree with every word that you spouted, you ignorant, piece of trash hippie asshole. Bravo, really, you're a winner. [be anonymous]
|
2/19/2004 7:16:36 PM
|
|
Doesn't it seem that most paternal thought forms are abusive to children? Love, [Lincoln]
|
2/19/2004 8:35:34 PM
|
|
Wow, those are some awesome debate skills at work in that note up there!
Anyways. I checked the link you provided for "other religious groups" and was surprised to find out that the Children of God (AKA The Family) had been active - and the fact that they prostitute (?) children was known - for at least 2 decades before the scandal we had here in the mid 90's. I'm wondering now if they have [mangum]
|
2/19/2004 9:49:55 PM
|
|
really vanished or if they have just moved to yet another country? And I wonder now how come nobody here knew that, but oh well...
You think that sitting on hard pews wearing uncomfortable clothes is bad for kids? What would you say if you saw children in processions (?) in LA... their parents often make "promises" in exchange for having a favor granted by g0d, and then they dress up the kids [mangum]
|
2/19/2004 9:50:00 PM
|
|
("Mary" seems a very popular costume for girls), and drag them around for miles and miles to the church where the promise was made. I mean, they could at least have the decency of making a$$es of themselves rather than their kids, don't you think? [mangum]
|
2/19/2004 9:50:10 PM
|
|
I doubt Gibson's film is going to be the most gruesome thing they see, especailly if they have cable TV. The network news gives them more than enough gore to twist their fragile little minds... movies got nothing on them.
[Peter_24601]
|
2/19/2004 10:01:25 PM
|
|
The part about 'sparing the rod' is revolting. Just the idea of intentionally striking my child makes me want scream. I could never do it, and I would never let anyone do that to him. For every finger someone lays on my son, they'd better be prepared to get five in return from me... just the thought that anyone would want to strike a child makes me sick.
[Peter_24601]
|
2/19/2004 10:07:45 PM
|
|
Wow. Very good research, and a very interesting insight. My email is paulonolan@cableone.net, and if you haven't heard of it already, I would like to introduce you to the atheist network, and perhaps you would like to do a radio interview? [distorted_perspectiv]
|
2/19/2004 10:28:19 PM
|
|
I was spanked as a kid and truthfully I plan as a parent to do the same. But I was only spank on the bumm and no other place. The spanking didn't cause any brusies mentally or physically. I for one never was forced to dress up for church, or had to sit on hard pews. I was told to dress how I please. I can not defend the movie The Passion due to the fact that I have not seen it. [Corrupted Nun]
|
2/20/2004 12:28:59 AM
|
|
Also the honoring the parents IF looked deeper into the bible, tells you that you should honor your parents as God would. So persay if your parents told you do drugs, do you think God would want you to. NO, so you don't honor that. I was never once told that I would go to hell cause I was a sinner. I was in fact told that if I did sin I only needed to ask for forgivness. [Corrupted Nun]
|
2/20/2004 12:31:11 AM
|
|
But each to their own choices. I do not look down upon any of my friends because they are wiccans, atheist, agnostic, or so forth. As you can tell, from my diary I am not the picture perfect Christian and most likely never will be. OH well. I am and that is all there is.
[Corrupted Nun]
|
2/20/2004 12:33:44 AM
|
|
ah well. i turned out all right. [ihate George W. Bush]
|
2/20/2004 12:45:05 AM
|
|
I second the bush-hater. I was spanked as a child, but only as a last resort. And I had to go to church and for a long time believed in the things I was taught. I no longer believe that I was brain-washed or lied to, because the people that taught me those things believed them just as much. I've since rejected all those teachings, but the point is, I turned out all right. [Tehomophile]
|
2/20/2004 2:04:25 AM
|
|
nowhere does the Bible say that you have to dress up or sit on hard pews. it also never says that you have to go to church and listen. those are all choices individuals make, just like it is a choice to go see Gibson's movie. they are not showing the film in elementary schools. the movie is rated R to encourage adult-only attendance. the circumstances aren't as bleak as you describe. [osucollegekid]
|
2/20/2004 10:46:50 AM
|
|
I couldn't agree with this more. I was seriously brainwashed from the age of 11-20 when I broke free of my parents and the church's views -which I still am a victim of that lovely guilt-trip for not going to church, believing in sin and jesus - if it wasn't for tramatic events in my life, I would probably still believe I wasn't brainwashed and that I have to devote my life to god.onto next entry [Window]
|
2/20/2004 11:12:05 AM
|
|
"Is Christianity Itself A Form Of Child Abuse?" YES YES YES! [missmeowmix]
|
2/20/2004 4:05:26 PM
|
|
Yeah, I'd have to agree with the spanking comments above. Although I doubt I will spank my kids, I fail to see how truly damaging it really is. If some kid becomes emotionally damaged, I would bet it reaches much further than being hit on the behind for doing something wrong.
I've got to give it to you AUUB, you amaze me with every title. Christianity supporting child abuse...WOW. [XianTheist]
|
2/20/2004 4:31:47 PM
|
|
1 : to forbear to destroy, punish, or harm
1 : obsolete : to do without
As in God is telling them, not to hit their children see "Do without"
As for other religions there are numorous repotings of Amish child abuse cases even in the news. -- One that was particulary bad. The father married in to the Amish religion and actually witnessed his wife stick a straight pin through his child's [Smile_GOD_luvs_u]
|
2/20/2004 5:53:21 PM
|
|
tounge. He left and then had to go to the court to get his kids and then things got really hectic because AMish like to stay out of the public eye. He did win the case and got his kids back. Also a lot of young adult citizens in Amish communities were shunned because they protested the practices and then went to the news channel. Theres a whole documentery about Amish child abuse. [Smile_GOD_luvs_u]
|
2/20/2004 5:55:54 PM
|
|
hmmm...
wow...
this is interesting
[xalvadora]
|
2/21/2004 6:16:05 PM
|
|
I like how you say "Gibson" without using his first name... Like Mozart or Freud. Kinda seems absurd.
:)
[Scarlet Ibis]
|
4/14/2004 4:32:50 AM
|
|