A few things that bother me about the fire at Notre Dame

There are a few inconsistencies in the Notre Dame de Paris fire which I don’t know how I didn’t catch sooner. All I’m doing is asking questions and looking for the truth.

It was made clear that the cathedral was closed, and no one was inside, and construction work had been done over the last four days.

During the coverage, reporters said about 100 minutes into the fire that the entire cathedral would be lost.

At the same time, the Deputy Mayor of Paris said that the quick action of the Bishop saved priceless artifacts with help from the Louvre. The museum sent multiple trucks.

The drive from the Louvre to Notre Dame is just over 30 minutes. That means from the exact moment the fire broke out there were about 90-minutes to safely secure a dozen priceless works of art and put them on trucks.

The crown of thorns as an example; it has only been shown less than five times in the last hundred years. It’s not just sitting in a box on a shelf.

Somehow, one of the most important artifacts of Christianity was left behind to burn? It was only saved by a remarkable Chaplin who ran into the inferno to rescue it.

Shortly into the fire, I mentioned to my mom how the fire must be out because the smoke is white. The reason for black smoke is all the soot from a fire which does not optimally burn carbon.

The fire itself looks odd. Everything looked like a glowing red charcoal brickette.

If there was no one in the building since it was closed, and according to reports no one was rescued from the scene, who was the individual seen on one of the towers nearly 45 minutes after the fire started? They appear to be wearing flowing clothes, perhaps robes. Why is the media saying silent when they could easily say it was one of the priests and end the story there.

This has also been a record fast arson investigation which found the fire to be an accident.

Everything happens for a reason, so why did the Al Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem burn at the same time?

Youtube is blaming an algorithm for making live streams of the fire as a 9/11 conspiracy. Either the algorythms on youtube are not working correctly, in which case how many other video’s and topics has it falsely flagged and why was it flagged as such? Let’s not just blame it on AI but figure out why.

Those who know their occultic history know that the second week of April, plus or minus a few days is an essential time for sacrifice. Look back through the past 30 years alone and see how many tragedies took place between April 7th to 16th.

Ordo ad chao, lug e tenebris

Log in to write a note
kat
April 18, 2019

there is no conspiracy quit watching fake Fox News

April 18, 2019

@kaliko  At least, you must see the symbology of a Christian church burning during the start of the last day of lent and week before Easter.

I don’t watch fox news.  The vast majority of news is fake and meant to divide and distract.  I should know, I ran campaigns to do just that when working for the government.

Quit watching news which elicits a reaction based on emotions, and has a track record of changing the narrative rather than telling the truth regardless of how it sounds.

I prefer to think for myself and draw conclusions based on facts regardless of where they lead.

If that’s your response, quit watching fox news – the conspiracy channel; I would suggest you get an education on how the world works behind the scenes or at least provide an intelligent argument.

It’s hard to take anyone seriously who just parrots what they’re told.

kat
April 18, 2019

@axalotal what I say is from my own experience watching it. how did you come to your facts just curious 🙂

April 18, 2019

@kaliko Facts on what, there are a few topics covered in the entry and above message chains.

kat
April 18, 2019

@axalotal you said you base your conclusions on facts and I was curious what source the facts came from?

April 18, 2019

@kaliko Again which topic, if we are sticking strictly to the political realm;
Mostly from reading government reports and other official documents, indictments and court transcripts, congressional testimony, personal digging when it comes to finding out someone’s background, talking with some sources I still have, and a background in defence and intelligence issues from a policy and public relations perspective.

It really comes down to a lot of reading, cross-referencing, and turning over every stone.

The 30 pages I wrote on Ukraine interference in the 2016 election has 100 footnotes to documents I’m sure anyone would consider legitimate.

kat
April 18, 2019

@axalotal I get much of my political info in similar ways. I am from a political family so I have lots of inside info as well 😉