Canada passes bill legalizing same-sex marriage

After a lot of sparring in the House Of Commons, and two near meltdowns during the Budget votes… Canada has finally made the step needed to legalize same sex marriage. Despite protest from the religious and those who are just flat out ignorant, the fact is a majority of Canadians do support equal rights for all, that includes marriage for all.

I persoanlly think this is the right decision and I for one am proud that the House was finally able to pass it through so it can be made into law. Let’s hope our neighbors to the south take the hint and follow suit…

Peter

MPs pass bill legalizing same-sex marriage

Canada has become the third country in the world to officially sanction same-sex marriage.

In a 158 to 133 vote, the House of Commons gave final approval of Bill C-38 on its third and final reading, with support from almost all New Democrat and Bloc Quebecois MPs.

An earlier Conservative motion to send the bill back to committee was voted down 158 to 127.

The decision marks the end of a long and divisive debate, although opponents are vowing to keep up the fight against the measure, which changes the traditional definition of marriage as between a man and a woman to one that includes same-sex couples.

Conservative Leader Stephen Harper is promising that he won’t let the issue rest; he says he’ll revisit the new law if he becomes the next prime minister.

He also repeated Tuesday his claim that the law lacks legitimacy because it passed with the support of the separatist Bloc party.

“I don’t think Canadians are going to accept as a final word a decision taken by only a minority of federalist MPs,” he said.

But Harper didn’t specify how he would address the issue if the Tories were to form the next government.

Liberal Justice Minister Irwin Cotler said Harper is “going to have to at least be honest with people,” and acknowledge that he would have to invoke the Constitution’s notwithstanding clause to override the new measure.

“They’re going to have to acknowledge that they want to override the (Charter of Rights), override constitutional-law decisions in nine jurisdictions in this country; override a unanimous decision of the Supreme Court of Canada; override the rule of law in this country,” Cotler said.

The clause, which has never been used, is available to provinces to override federal laws that intrude on provincial jurisdiction.

But almost every provincial and territorial government has already legalized same-sex marriage. And the new law will ensure that the four “hold-out” jurisdictions that yet haven’t — Alberta, Prince Edward Island, Nunavut and the Northwest Territories — now must.

“It’s an historic moment, it’s about equality for gays and lesbian,” said NDP MP Libby Davies.

Alberta premier Ralph Klein, who is “strongly opposed” to the bill on moral grounds, acknowledged Tuesday that little can be done to stop same-sex marriages in his province.

“Since this is federal legislation, to use the notwithstanding clause as contained in our own Marriage Act would be frivolous,” Klein told reporters in Calgary. “It wouldn’t stand up in any court of law. So there are some other options that we would have to consider.”

Klein said although some members of his caucus are threatening to use every legal weapon at their disposal to get around the legislation, “there are no legal weapons; there’s nothing left in the arsenal.”

As expected, about Liberal MPs voted against the measure tonight. Martin declared it a free vote for backbench MPs, but cabinet ministers were under orders to vote in favour of the bill.

On Tuesday, a junior cabinet minister chose to resign and return to the backbenches rather than vote in favour of same sex marriage.

Joe Comuzzi, the minister of state for economic development in northern Ontario, informed the prime minister of his decision in the early morning.

“I promised faithfully to the people of Thunder Bay-Superior North that I would defend the traditional definition of marriage,” he explained to reporters on Parliament Hill.

“Tonight, on the final vote of third reading, I intend to fulfill that obligation to the people that elected me.”

Reprinted from CTV.ca

Log in to write a note
June 28, 2005

I’m impressed with our government. That doesn’t happen often.

June 28, 2005

I do not believe in The same-sex marriage. I have my right to. Anne~

“Despite protest from the religious and those who are just flat out ignorant,” So just because you’re not religious then that somehow makes you more enlightened? Making such statements like “oh, these people who don’t have the same beliefs as I do are ignorant” makes you look ignorant and bigoted yourself. But whatever. Liberals know everything, right? How wonderful that must be for you.

June 28, 2005

“I do not believe in The same-sex marriage. I have my right to.” Amazing Grace This is true. She – and all other conservatives out there – have every right to disagree with it and oppose it. I only take issue with those who choose to force their opinions and personal beliefs on others. …

June 28, 2005

If you don’t approve of drinking, don’t drink. If you don’t like a tv show, don’t watch it. If you disagree with an author’s point of view, don’t read their books. And, if you don’t approve of gay marriage, then don’t do it. That would be the logical thing to do. But, as we all know, here in the US, not everyone is so logical and rational. …

With a 65% divorce rate in the USA, I don’t think the gays can do much worse. Its always about money. Married couples pay less in taxes and insurance than single people. Singles account for more than 1/3 of all federal taxes paid. There’s your answer. Who really gives a $hit if gays want to marry. Its not your life.

June 28, 2005

Several smaller towns near my own have outlawed hard liquors. Many people over the years have made all kinds of threats against tv stations for showing various shows they did not approve of. We’re all too familiar with the Harry Potter book burnings and the controversy that surrounded The Davinci Code. …

June 28, 2005

And, some people would go out of their way just to make sure homosexuals aren’t allowed to have the same rights and privileges as everyone else.

June 28, 2005

At least people in Canada seem to have a good grip on logic and reality. Whenever people start spouting off that the US has more freedoms than any other country, I remind them that Canada not only has the same freedoms we do, but they even have more – especially now. ;-p I am seriously considering moving to Canada – the new land of the free. Hey Peter… How’s the job market there?

*looks up* No, it’s not because you’re religious that you’re ignorant. It’s because you don’t realize you’re opposing equal rights. You have every right to be a bigot, just as you have every right to join the Ku Klux Klan, just don’t expect us to be nice to you.

I would consider moving to Canada, except that I’ve grown quite fond of the health care system here.

June 28, 2005

Let’s do hope that us neighbors to the south follow suit.

June 29, 2005

Good show, Canada!

June 29, 2005

“So just because youÂ’re not religious then that somehow makes you more enlightened?” Certainly an elementary reading of what Peter wrote shows that you’re wrong. He wrote “Despite protests of the religious and the flat out ignorant…” Which clearly implies that he considers the religious and the flat out ignorant to be two distinct groups. Otherwise he wouldn’t have separated them.

June 30, 2005

Now, if only America could be this enlightened. Good on Canada for legalizing what should be legal all over the world. And good on Spain, too!