White House official Libby guilty

A former key White House official, Lewis Libby, has been found guilty of obstruction of justice and perjury.

Libby, ex-chief of staff to Vice-President Dick Cheney, faces a prison term of up to 25 years. He will be sentenced in June.

He was accused of lying to the FBI and a grand jury over revelations about CIA agent Valerie Plame’s identity.

Libby’s lawyer said they were “very disappointed” at the verdict, and would ask for a new trial, or would appeal.

Libby, who goes by the nickname “Scooter”, was found guilty on four out of five counts. He was acquitted on one count of lying to the FBI.

‘Honest lapses’

Correspondents say the case shed light on the inner workings of the Bush White House.

Critics claimed the White House had deliberately leaked Ms Plame’s identity to ruin her career. Her husband, former ambassador Joseph Wilson, had publicly cast doubt on the Bush administration’s case for going to war in Iraq.

LIBBY CHARGES AND VERDICT
Two counts of perjury – guilty on both
Two counts of making false statements – guilty on one
One count of obstruction of justice – guilty

It can be a crime to reveal the identity of an undercover CIA agent.

The alleged cover-up rather than the leak itself was the subject of the trial.

Libby told FBI investigators and a grand jury investigating the leak of Ms Plame’s name, that he had learned of her identity as a CIA agent from reporters.

However, several people testified that he discussed her identity before the date he said he learned of it.

“He claims he forgot nine conversations with eight people over a four-week period,” prosecution lawyer Peter Zeidenberg said in his closing statement.

The defence maintained that Libby’s false statements were the results of honest lapses in memory by a man tasked with extraordinary responsibility.

“He was bombarded with a blizzard of information. Those briefings would make your toes curl,” defence lawyer Theodore Wells said.

Bush ‘saddened’

After the verdict, and standing beside his client, who remains free until sentencing, Mr Wells said: “We have every confidence that ultimately Mr Libby will be vindicated.

“We believe he is totally innocent, and did not do anything wrong.”

Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald said he was “gratified” by the verdict, but that it was “sad” that “we had a high-level official who obstructed justice and lied under oath”.

US President George W Bush “said that he respected the jury’s verdict. He said he was saddened for Scooter Libby and his family,” said White House spokeswoman Dana Perino.

But Senate majority leader Harry Reid said: “I welcome the jury’s verdict. It’s about time someone in the Bush administration has been held accountable for the campaign to manipulate intelligence and discredit war critics.”

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/world/americas/6424319.stm

Published: 2007/03/06 18:04:50 GMT

© BBC MMVII

Log in to write a note
March 6, 2007

One of two things are going to happen here, perhaps both. There were some irregularities with the judge and jury that may be grounds for a new trial. I also would expect Bush to pardon Libby after the 08 elections.

March 6, 2007

One of two things are going to happen here, perhaps both. There were some irregularities with the judge and jury that may be grounds for a new trial. I also would expect Bush to pardon Libby after the 08 elections.

March 6, 2007

RYN: I can’t provide you with anything because I’m not a lawyer working on this trial. It’s my understanding that the defense isn’t happy with some of the notes passed between the jury and judge. Either way, the defense was going to appeal this decision if Libby was found guily whether they have something or not. Actually, first they’ll ask the trial judge for a new trial and when he reject that they’ll appeal. The whole point is to delay the final decision on this until after the November 08 elections, at which time they probably think Bush will pardon Libby.

March 6, 2007

RYN: I can’t provide you with anything because I’m not a lawyer working on this trial. It’s my understanding that the defense isn’t happy with some of the notes passed between the jury and judge. Either way, the defense was going to appeal this decision if Libby was found guily whether they have something or not. Actually, first they’ll ask the trial judge for a new trial and when he reject that they’ll appeal. The whole point is to delay the final decision on this until after the November 08 elections, at which time they probably think Bush will pardon Libby.

March 6, 2007

Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald said he was “gratified” by the verdict, but that it was “sad” that “we had a high-level official who obstructed justice and lied under oath”. LMAO! Im sorry, but this is funny after the previous president (though he was never put on trial for what he should have been).

March 6, 2007

Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald said he was “gratified” by the verdict, but that it was “sad” that “we had a high-level official who obstructed justice and lied under oath”. LMAO! Im sorry, but this is funny after the previous president (though he was never put on trial for what he should have been).

March 6, 2007

Sweet! what nice news

March 6, 2007

Sweet! what nice news